REPORT ON ACTIVITIES  2005 / 2006

 

 

KEY ACHIEVEMENTS

 

 

·         Sustained pressure on Government to address energy crisis

 

·         New rules for Climate Change Agreements and EU Emissions Trading tackled

 

·         Positive developments in environmental permitting and minerals procurement

 

·         Further initiatives under Ceramic Industry Health and Safety Pledge

 

·         Progress on approaches to silica and REACH

 

·         A successful industry Parliamentary reception

 

 

 

ENVIRONMENT

 

Climate Change Agreements

 

The operation of Climate Change Agreements was complicated by their interaction with the EU Emissions Trading Scheme.  Annual CCA targets, in addition to those for the established biennial milestone years, were introduced for participants that had obtained exemption from Phase 1 of EU ETS. 

 

Arrangements  established for reporting performance against new targets for the first interim milestone year ending in  September proceeded satisfactorily despite the delay in official confirmation of the acceptance of the opt-outs, the information being duly submitted to Defra.  The vast majority of companies met their target.  The BCC also co-ordinated a group scheme through CICS for verification of overachievement  prior to the banking or sale of credits.

 

The third milestone year for all companies was due to end in September 2006.  Some difficulty was experienced in forecasting sector performance due to the late submission of data.  Targets for the milestone year for companies also participating in Phase 1 of EU ETS would be subject to adjustment to avoid their being penalised or benefiting twice as a result of their performance.  Nevertheless it became apparent that companies might face the risk of tighter CCA targets due to favourable EU ETS results.  The BCC undertook to prepare guidance  on how the adjustment would be carried out, and its likely repercussions.

 

Emissions Trading Scheme

 

The vast majority of ceramic manufacturers eligible for EU ETS exercised their right to apply for exclusion until the commencement of Phase 2 in 2008.  Considerable efforts were made to ensure that the opt-out conditions were acceptable.  The delay until early 2006 in the official confirmation by the European Commission of acceptance of the opt-out applications led in turn to uncertainty on the part of companies as to the conditions to which they would be subject during the current CCA interim milestone year.

 

Assistance was provided for companies that participated in Phase 1 of EU ETS in submitting verified data to the Environment Agency  and in surrendering allowances by the due dates.  Assessment of the performance of participating companies was subsequently published by Defra, leading to concerns about the consequent impact on adjusted CCA targets.

 

 

The BCC was closely involved throughout the year in consultations with Defra and DTI on the introduction of the second phase of EU ETS from  January, 2008, which would affect all eligible installations.  Key issues to be resolved included harmonisation within the EU of the interpretation of aspects of the Directive determining thresholds, the establishment of a de minimis threshold for smaller companies, the preservation of allowances when sites were rationalised, and the treatment of process emissions in calculating allowances.  There was some indication that the allocation for the ceramic sector under the National Allocation Plan would be at a similar level for Phase 2 as for Phase 1.  The NAP, including allocations for individual installations, was due for submission to the EC by Defra in late summer.

 

IPPC

 

Although the majority of applications by member companies for PPC permits had been dealt with satisfactorily by local authorities, problems associated with a small but significant number of installations persisted.  The BCC was involved in repeated discussions with Defra and local authorities to resolve issues causing the delays, leading to the eventual inclusion of the subject in the current Defra review of PPC.

 

Following publication of the second draft BREF document, the BCC participated in the final meeting of regulators and interested parties in Seville on the content of the document.   Dissatisfaction  was subsequently expressed to the UK Government about the lack of support provided by UK regulators in the process, compared with that of other member states.  Publication  was expected by the year end, one year later than originally intended.

 

Environmental Permitting

 

The BCC participated in the stakeholder group established by Defra to develop proposals for a new environmental permitting programme (EPP).  It was subsequently able to welcome in principle consultation on a scheme to replace existing PPC permits and waste management licences with a single environmental permit.  The  system would streamline and simplify current mechanisms through fewer, simpler rules, including standard rules permits, and clearer guidance, allowing industry, regulators and the public to focus on environmental outcomes rather than how they were achieved.  However the support of the BCC was conditional on existing permits being deemed valid without alteration,  there being no extension of operational requirements and no change in regulatory responsibility without full industry agreement.

 

Waste Management

 

The BCC submitted a proposal to the Government Better Regulation Unit for reform of the regulations prescribing exemptions from waste management licensing.  The existing regulations  failed to accommodate alternative materials increasingly used in the manufacture of ceramic products.  The requirement for a waste management licence acted as a deterrent to the efficient use of resources, without any environmental benefit.

 

The BCC subsequently welcomed the publication by Defra in the EPP consultation of suggested criteria for determining activities exempt from licensing.  Assurance was received that the industry’s proposal for reform of the exemptions would be included in the full review to be undertaken by Defra later in the year.  Note was also taken of indications from the EC that the revision of the Waste Framework Directive might also result in a more flexible approach to determining when a recycled material could cease to be regarded as waste.

 

 Discussions were held with the Environment Agency on practical problems arising from the introduction of the New Hazardous Waste Regulations.  Detailed guidance was issued on listings for common industry wastes under the European Waste Catalogue.  Particular attention was paid to the treatment of sludge and presscake from effluent treatment plant in view of the lack of clarity in official instructions as to how this waste should be classified.

 

Water

 

The BCC responded critically to  Environment Agency proposals for the time limiting of abstraction licences for dewatering quarries.  The proposals were geared towards abstractions for use and were inappropriate for the less complex situations presented by the industry’s operations.  The concern remained that there should be a presumption in favour of continuing existing operations, that the procedure for obtaining licences for transfer rather than use should not involve complex hydro-geological assessments, and that time limits should match the duration of extraction permissions.

 

Minerals and Planning

 

The BCC welcomed the content of draft MPS1 on minerals planning, and the annex dealing with planning for brick clay.  Meetings were held with ODPM and the Planning Officers Society to discuss the fine detail of the proposals.  Discussions with ODPM on the content of a revised draft proved more problematical.   Uncertainty remained as to whether the guidance would adopt the clear conclusions on landbanks in the independent research undertaken for the Government Brick Clay : Issues for Planning. The long delay in publication of the guidance by ODPM did little to assist progress in discussions with mineral planning authorities on minerals development plans.

 

The publication of minerals planning factsheets on brick clay and fireclay by the British Geological Survey, to which the BCC made input, was welcomed.  They provided useful information on the industry to complement planning guidance and to assist those involved in the planning process.

 

 The complex nature of the new planning  process, and the emphasis on community involvement, gave rise to doubts as to whether it would result in the clarity and speed of delivery it had promised.  Nevertheless the BCC continued to respond to proposals for development plans that would affect members’ operations.  Evidence was  given to the Examination in Public on the North East Regional Spatial  Strategy, focusing on the need for acceptable policies  on brick clay and fireclay to provide the security of supply the industry required.

 

Work was undertaken with the South East England Regional Assembly on the development of a proforma for monitoring brick clay reserves for the purposes of regional planning.  The objective was to enable companies to provide the information in a form that could not be misinterpreted.

 

An effective European industry lobby, in which the BCC played a significant role, succeeded in ensuring that amendments to the proposed Mining Waste Directive that would have jeopardised the industry’s interests were not carried in the European Parliament.  The subsequent agreement between the Commission and Parliament resulted in a Directive acceptable to the industry. Discussions continued with DTI and ODPM on the manner of implementation of the Directive in the UK, particularly the permitting process and the exercise of derogations, and on the input into the EC Committee established to determine the interpretation of definitions, waste classifications  and other technical detail.

 

 

 

ENERGY

 

The year was characterised by intensive lobbying of Government and the EC on the impact of high energy prices and imperfections in the energy market.  The BCC led a delegation on behalf of the Energy Intensive Users to expose the impact of high  prices and the actions necessary to remedy the situation.  The outcome of the meeting was the apparent acceptance by the Minister  that the dysfunctional European energy market was resulting in UK manufacturers paying the highest gas and electricity prices in Europe.

 

In November representations were made, through the EIUG, to the Prime Minister on the need for immediate action to increase reserve capacity and provide secure access to additional gas supplies via the interconnecter.  The difficulties arose  from the interaction between the UK commodity market and the regulated market in Europe.  Intervention  was required until the UK had adequate access to reserve supplies, the European market was liberalised and anti-competitive prices were eliminated.

 

A special meeting of the EIUG in January established the actions necessary to restore functionality to the UK gas market, and its expectations of the DTI.  In parallel the EC preliminary report on European energy markets concluded that some large suppliers were holding back supplies resulting in artificially high prices.  Anti-trust investigations would ensue if the behaviour persisted until publication of the final report later in the year.

 

The BCC  responded to the DTI Energy review, concentrating on the importance of reliable energy supplies and the early adoption of the measures  identified as necessary to address market difficulties.  The response also pointed to the improvements required to EU ETS to reduce carbon emissions through greater transparency and simplification, and to the need for parallel mechanisms for the transport and domestic sectors to reduce the burden on industry.

 

In May the new Secretary of State for Trade and Industry announced the creation of a Business Energy Forum -  a high level group co-chaired by the Energy Minister and the CBI Director-General Designate, and a Business Climate Change and Energy Group - a main policy forum with Government on energy and climate change issues.  The BCC Chief Executive would be a nominated member of both groups.

 

Proposals for an industry energy contract were purued in co-operation with Utilyx during the year.  The arrangement was modified in the light of reaction from members, focusing on a wholesale linked contract based initially on a shorter term fixed allocation, with flexibility in exposure level in the first year.

 

 

 

HUMAN RESOURCES

 

Industrial Relations

 

The review of the Building Brick & Allied Industries wages and conditions was concluded after a second ballot.  The two period deal comprised a 4% increase in basic rates for a 13 month period beginning March 2005, a 4% increase in basic rates for a further 12 month period beginning April 2006, an additional day of paternity leave and the establishment of a working party to consider the feasibility of engaging in a consolidation exercise in advance of the next review.

 

The rewriting of the Wages Structure for the Ceramic Joint Council was completed.  The most significant change was the introduction of current year accrual of holidays with pay.

 

The two year agreement made by the Council was due for review in August 2006.  Three meetings of the Council resulted in impasse leading to informal discussions aimed at resolving the difficulties encountered.

 

Preparations were made for the review of the Refractories Wages Board Agreement reached in 2004.

 

Member companies were alerted to the repercussions of changes in case law on long term sick leave establishing that the right to statutory paid holiday did not continue to accrue during such leave.  Attention was also drawn to the legislation to be applied from October 2006 prohibiting discrimination against employees on the grounds of age.  Many aspects of working life, including the selection for redundancy by reference to length of service, and other service related benefits, would be affected.  A seminar for members on the subject was held in December.

 

Health and Safety

 

Phase II of the Ceramic Industry Health and Safety Pledge was launched in the autumn, following consultations with member companies.  During the year the commitment of the vast majority to the revised Pledge was secured.  Companies were encouraged to adopt the Pledge logo designed to promote it throughout the industry as a gateway for improvement in health and safety performance.

 

Statistics on accidents, injury and time lost in the first four years of the Pledge had shown slow progress, and  improvement was sought by both the industry and HSE.  First analysis of the statistics collected during the year indicated some movement towards meeting that aspiration.

Preliminary results from HSE research into the benefits for the brick industry of participation in the Pledge suggested a positive impact on health and safety performance.  Nevertheless pressure from the HSE for further improvement persisted.  Consultants were commissioned by HSE to undertake research into sector based health and safety initiatives, and consultation was issued on further ways to increase the involvement of employees in health and safety risk management.

 

The keynote address to the Pledge Conference in October was given by Dr. Elizabeth  Gibby, Director of Injuries Reduction Programme at HSE.  Presentations were also given by Dr. Janet Asherson, Head of Health and Safety at the CBI, and Hugh Robertson, Head of Health and Safety Policy at the TUC.  The occasion provided the stage for the presentation of the industry Health and Safety Awards to successful companies and employees.

 

The importance of improving the performance of contractors to the industry was reflected in the emphasis placed on development of the Contractors’ Charter and Passport Scheme.  The Working Party overseeing the scheme continued to promote its use through its refinement and guidance for member companies.

 

A working group was established to consider the viability of introducing National Vocational Qualifications for managers with responsibility for onsite quarries.  The preference for a dedicated industry training package rather than the adoption of NVQs, which might not fit the particular application, was established.

 

A basic toolkit to assist companies in resolving problems related to slips and trips in the workplace was made available.  The prevention of accidents connected with transport was also identified as a priority, a working party being established to produce guidance.

 

Members were kept  informed of and involved in developments affecting workplace exposure levels for crystalline silica.  The BCC responded in critical detail to the HSE proposal for a level of 0.1mg/m3, the scientific justification for which was considered to be flawed.  Nevertheless guidance for companies was prepared in anticipation of the introduction of the level later in the year.  In Europe an agreement was reached between the Social Partners, with Commission endorsement , on measures for the protection of workers through good practice.  The agreement would be implemented through instruction to companies, and monitoring and reporting of performance at company, national and European level.

 

Recommendations were produced on labelling of construction products to alert customers to any health and safety risk associated with exposure to silica.

 

The BCC was fully involved on concerted representations at European level to ensure that REACH - the EU Regulatory Framework for Chemicals - did not impose unreasonable burdens on the industry’s operations.   A seminar in March addressed the possible repercussions of the forthcoming legislation.   Plans were laid for the development of a collective approach at industry sector level.

 

 

 

COMPETITIVENESS AND EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

 

Commercial

 

Meetings of the European Parliament Ceramics Forum in July 2005 and April 2006, attended by BCC, focused on  trade issues affecting the industry, notably imports of tableware from China.  Support was gained for  action to achieve protection through origin marking of imports into the EU, and measures to eliminate counterfeiting and copying.  Although the subsequent EC proposal for origin marking did not receive the overall endorsement of the DTI,  the possibility of support for a limited sector based scheme remained.

 

BCC activity to address developments regarding restrictions on lead and cadmium in tableware, particularly in the United States, continued. 

The DTI was also alerted to the need for a measured approach to implementation of the Restriction of Hazardous Substances Regulations to avoid an unreasonable impact on industry sales.

 

The BCC responded critically to Government proposals for the introduction of a Planning Gain Supplement on all development.  The application of such a levy to industrial development, including minerals permissions with wasting assets, was considered particularly inappropriate.

 

Lobbying and Representation

 

A parliamentary reception held in October enabled senior figures from  member companies to apprise MPs of the key issues that the industry faced.  Documentation prepared for the meeting highlighted arguments in favour of a more measured approach to regulation, reform of the energy market, emissions controls which did not jeopardise competitiveness, proportionality in pollution control, a risk based framework for process and product safety, safeguards to ensure free and fair international trade and continuing close liaison between the industry and Government.  Regular meetings were also held with North Staffordshire MPs and West Midlands MEPs. 

 

The BCC continued to work closely with sector associations and all other bodies serving the industry’s interests.